Blog
Why Your Proposals Keep Getting Rejected (And It's Not What You Think)
Our Favourite Blogs:
Here's something that'll make you squirm in your ergonomic office chair: 87% of business proposals never even get read past the executive summary. I've been watching perfectly capable professionals in Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney butcher million-dollar opportunities for the past 18 years, and frankly, it's getting ridiculous.
You know what really gets under my skin? The same people who spend three hours perfecting their LinkedIn headshots will fire off a half-baked proposal that looks like it was written during morning smoko. Then they sit around wondering why their competitor - who charges 30% more - keeps winning the work.
I used to be one of those people. Back in 2007, I lost a $400K government contract because I thought fancy graphics and buzzwords would compensate for not actually answering their questions. Bloody embarrassing, really.
The Real Problem Isn't Your Writing
Everyone bangs on about grammar and formatting. Sure, typos make you look like an amateur, but that's not why your proposals are dying faster than a wifi connection in rural Tasmania.
The real killer? You're solving the wrong problem.
Most business owners approach proposals like they're writing their autobiography. "Let me tell you about our 25 years of experience and our award-winning team!" Nobody cares about your trophy cabinet when their roof is leaking, mate.
Here's what actually matters: demonstrating you understand their specific pain point better than they do. When Telstra finally figured this out with their enterprise clients, their win rate jumped from 23% to 61% in eighteen months. Smart operators.
The Three-Hour Rule That Changes Everything
Want to know the difference between proposals that win and proposals that become expensive paperweights? Winners spend three hours researching for every hour they spend writing.
This isn't about stalking their social media (though LinkedIn can be surprisingly useful). It's about understanding their industry pressures, their internal challenges, and what keeps their CFO awake at night.
I learned this lesson the hard way when competing for a logistics contract in Perth. While I was pontificating about our "cutting-edge methodologies," my competitor had identified that their real issue wasn't efficiency - it was compliance reporting that was eating up 12 hours per week of management time. Guess who got the gig?
The three-hour rule breaks down like this:
- One hour researching the company and key decision makers
- One hour understanding their industry challenges and recent developments
- One hour identifying gaps between what they're asking for and what they actually need
Everything else is just window dressing.
Stop Writing to Committees
This might be controversial, but committees don't make decisions - people do. Even when there's a "procurement committee" involved, there's usually one person whose opinion carries more weight.
Find that person. Understand what they care about.
The procurement manager at a major Australian bank once told me something that changed how I approach every proposal: "I don't read past page three unless you've convinced me you understand our regulatory environment better than we do."
That's not arrogance talking - that's someone drowning in vendor pitches who needs to quickly separate the wheat from the chaff.
The Goldilocks Principle of Proposal Length
Too short and you look lazy. Too long and nobody reads it. The sweet spot? Usually 8-12 pages for anything under $100K, 15-25 pages for larger opportunities.
But here's where most people get it wrong: they pad with irrelevant case studies and corporate fluff. Your proposal should be like a good espresso - concentrated and purposeful.
One page should equal one key point. If you can't defend why each page deserves to exist, cut it.
I've seen 40-page proposals lose to 6-page responses because the longer document buried its value proposition under layers of corporate speak. Don't be that person.
Why Your Executive Summary Is Backwards
Most executive summaries read like this: "Acme Corporation is pleased to submit this proposal for your consideration. We are a leading provider of..."
Wrong approach entirely.
Your executive summary should start with their problem and end with their solution. Something like: "Your current inventory management system is costing you approximately $47K annually in lost productivity. Here's how we'll reduce that to under $8K within six months."
See the difference? One version talks about you. The other talks about their money.
Handling office politics and understanding stakeholder dynamics often plays a bigger role in proposal success than technical capability. When you can demonstrate awareness of their internal challenges, you move from vendor to trusted advisor.
The Hidden Cost of Generic Proposals
Templates aren't evil, but treating every opportunity the same way is commercial suicide. Your proposal for a mining company shouldn't read like your pitch to a tech startup.
Industry language matters. Compliance requirements matter. Cultural fit matters more than you think.
I once watched a Sydney-based consultancy lose a major resources sector contract because they kept using terms like "agile methodologies" and "disruptive innovation." Their client operated 24/7 mining operations - they didn't want disruption, they wanted reliability and proven processes.
Know your audience. Speak their language. Use their terminology.
Technical Specifications: The Silent Killer
Here's something nobody talks about: technical specifications often eliminate more vendors than they select. If you can't meet 100% of their technical requirements, don't waste everyone's time with creative interpretations.
Better to acknowledge the gap and explain how you'll address it than to hope they won't notice. Procurement teams aren't stupid - they'll spot your workarounds during the evaluation process.
When Westpac updated their vendor requirements in 2019, they eliminated 40% of applicants before opening a single proposal simply because submissions didn't match their updated technical specifications. Attention to detail isn't optional in this game.
Pricing Strategy That Actually Works
Most people either lowball to win or price high to create "value perception." Both approaches miss the mark.
The winning strategy? Demonstrate clear ROI that makes your price irrelevant.
Instead of "Our services cost $50K," try "Our solution will save you $127K annually while improving response times by 34%. Investment required: $50K."
Frame everything in terms of their return, not your revenue.
When emotional intelligence training became mainstream, smart providers didn't compete on price - they competed on measurable outcomes. Retention improvements, productivity gains, reduced conflict resolution costs. Numbers that CFOs could justify to their boards.
References That Actually Matter
Stop listing every client you've ever worked with. Nobody cares that you helped Bob's Burger Bar optimise their ordering system when they're evaluating you for enterprise software implementation.
Include 2-3 references that directly relate to their industry, size, and challenge. Quality over quantity, always.
Better yet, include specific results: "Reduced processing time by 43% for Similar Mining Corp, resulting in $230K annual savings." That's a reference with teeth.
Follow-Up That Doesn't Annoy
Your proposal submission isn't the finish line - it's the starting gun. But most follow-up is either non-existent or aggressively annoying.
The sweet spot? One meaningful touchpoint per week with new information, insights, or clarifications. Not "just checking in" emails that waste everyone's time.
Share relevant industry articles. Offer to clarify technical points. Provide additional case studies if specific questions arise. Make yourself useful, not persistent.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Winning
Sometimes you won't win, and it won't be because your proposal was inferior. Politics, existing relationships, and budget constraints often trump merit.
That's fine. Not every opportunity is worth pursuing, and losing quickly is better than winning the wrong clients.
I'd rather lose three proposals to competitors than win one that becomes a nightmare project. Your reputation is worth more than any single contract.
Focus on opportunities where you can deliver genuine value, not just where you can technically meet requirements. Your future self will thank you.
The proposal writing game has changed dramatically over the past decade. Buyers are more sophisticated, competition is fiercer, and margins are tighter. But the fundamentals remain the same: understand their problem better than anyone else, solve it efficiently, and prove you can deliver.
Everything else is just paperwork.