Why Your "Difficult Person" Problem is Actually Your Communication Problem (And How I Learnt This the Hard Way)

Related Articles:

• Brand Local - My Thoughts
• Phrase Group - Blog

The worst piece of advice I ever received was from my first manager in 2008: "Just avoid the difficult people and focus on the ones who want to work with you."

Fifteen years later, after running workshops across Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane for everyone from mining executives to healthcare administrators, I can tell you this approach will absolutely torpedo your career faster than you can say "personality conflict."

Here's what no one tells you about dealing with difficult people – 87% of workplace conflicts stem from miscommunication, not personality disorders. Yet we keep labelling people as "difficult" when really, we're just rubbish at adapting our communication style.

The Five Types You'll Meet (And Why They're Not Actually the Problem)

The Micromanager: They're not controlling because they hate you. They're usually drowning in responsibility with zero training on how to delegate effectively. I've worked with hundreds of these folks, and once you understand they're operating from fear rather than malice, everything changes.

The Negative Nancy: Always pointing out what won't work. But here's the thing – they're often your best risk assessors. Companies like Atlassian actively seek out these "devil's advocate" personalities because they prevent costly mistakes.

The Know-It-All: Exhausting? Absolutely. Wrong? Not as often as you'd think.

The Silent Treatment: Won't speak up in meetings, never volunteers information. Plot twist: they're probably introverts being forced into extroverted meeting cultures. Give them written agendas 24 hours in advance and watch the magic happen.

The Explosive Reactor: This one's trickier. But nine times out of ten, they're dealing with personal stress that's spilling over. Not your job to fix it, but understanding it helps you navigate around the landmines.

What I Got Spectacularly Wrong for Years

I used to think the best approach was to "manage difficult people." Completely backwards thinking. You can't manage another adult's personality – you can only manage your response to it.

This realisation hit me during a particularly brutal project in Perth around 2019. I was dealing with a procurement manager who seemed determined to derail everything I suggested. Hostile questions, eye-rolling, the works. I spent weeks strategising how to "handle" her.

Then I accidentally discovered she'd been burned by three previous consultants who'd over-promised and under-delivered. Her "difficult" behaviour was actually protective. Once I acknowledged this and showed concrete evidence of my track record, she became one of my strongest advocates.

The problem wasn't her personality. It was my assumption that her resistance was personal rather than professional.

The Australian Workplace Reality Check

Let's be honest about something: Australian workplace culture actively creates difficult people. We're conflict-avoidant to a fault, then wonder why problems explode later.

I've sat through countless Melbourne office meetings where everyone nods agreeably, then tears the proposal apart in the car park afterwards. This passive-aggressive cycle breeds exactly the kind of "difficult" behaviours we complain about.

The solution isn't more team-building retreats with trust falls. It's creating psychological safety where people can disagree professionally without being labelled as "difficult."

The Scripts That Actually Work

After thousands of interactions, here are the phrases that consistently defuse tension:

Instead of: "You're being unreasonable."
Try: "Help me understand your perspective on this."

Instead of: "That's not my problem."
Try: "Let's figure out who can best handle this."

Instead of: "You always do this."
Try: "I've noticed a pattern. Can we address it?"

But here's the crucial bit – these aren't magic words. Your tone, timing, and genuine curiosity matter more than the exact phrasing. I've seen people use these scripts sarcastically and make situations worse.

Why Your HR Department is Part of the Problem

Controversial opinion: Most HR departments are terrible at handling interpersonal conflicts because they're focused on legal compliance rather than relationship repair.

They'll mediate a meeting, document everything carefully, then send both parties back to work together without addressing the underlying communication breakdown. It's like putting a Band-Aid on a broken bone.

The best resolution I ever witnessed was between two senior engineers in Adelaide who couldn't stand each other. Instead of formal HR intervention, their manager gave them a project that required collaboration and made it clear their bonuses depended on successful completion. Suddenly, they figured out how to communicate effectively.

Sometimes external pressure creates internal solutions.

The Emotional Intelligence Factor Everyone Ignores

Here's what gets me fired up: organisations spend millions on technical training but virtually nothing on emotional intelligence development. Then they act surprised when technically competent people can't work together.

I once worked with a Brisbane-based engineering firm where the most technically brilliant project manager was driving everyone to resignation. Not because he was mean – he genuinely cared about the work. But he had zero awareness of how his communication style affected others.

Six months of targeted training later, his team retention rate improved by 300%. Same person, same technical skills, completely different outcomes.

The ROI on emotional intelligence training is astronomical, yet most companies treat it as "nice to have" rather than business critical.

The Power Dynamic Nobody Discusses

Let's talk about something uncomfortable: sometimes "difficult people" are just people without power expressing frustration at broken systems.

If your receptionist seems difficult, maybe it's because they're dealing with angry customers all day while having no authority to actually solve problems. If your junior staff appear resistant, perhaps it's because they're excluded from decision-making processes that directly affect their work.

I've seen this pattern repeatedly across different industries. The people labelled as "difficult" often have legitimate concerns that aren't being heard through proper channels.

What Works in Practice (Based on Real Results)

Regular Check-ins: Not performance reviews – actual "how are things going" conversations. Weekly for new team members, monthly for established staff. Canva does this brilliantly with their team structure.

Clear Expectations: Document what good looks like. I'm amazed how many conflicts stem from unclear expectations rather than unwillingness to meet them.

Address Issues Early: Have the awkward conversation at 3/10 intensity rather than waiting until it hits 8/10. Much easier to course-correct than to rebuild.

Training Investment: Stop treating difficult conversation skills as optional. Make it mandatory for anyone managing people.

The Bottom Line That Management Consultants Won't Tell You

Most "difficult people" problems are actually "difficult systems" problems disguised as personality conflicts.

Before you label someone as difficult, ask yourself:

• Are they clear on expectations?
• Do they have the resources to succeed?
• Are there systemic barriers to their performance?
• Is their "difficult" behaviour a symptom of a bigger issue?

Nine times out of ten, fixing the system eliminates the behaviour.

The remaining 10% – the genuinely problematic personalities – become much easier to address when you're not drowning in system-created conflicts.

After 15 years of doing this work, I'm convinced that most workplace interpersonal problems are solvable. We just need to stop treating symptoms and start addressing root causes.

And sometimes, the root cause is looking back at us in the mirror.